Fiscal subject related
In this respect, taxpayers fall into 3 main risk classes (small, medium, and high), and the criteria according to which the tax risk class or subclass is established are the following:
- criteria relating to tax registration;
- criteria for the submission of tax returns;
- criteria relating to the level of declaration;
- criteria relating to the fulfillment of payment obligations to the consolidated general budget.
Therefore, in order to achieve the desideratum provided by Article 7 of the Fiscal Procedure Code, the management of tax compliance risks has a decisive role to play, and the measures and actions taken in this regard must take into account the increase of efficiency and effectiveness in order to achieve the objectives of increasing the level of tax compliance, reducing tax evasion, as well as reducing the administration costs and modernizing the agency's activities, the National Fiscal Administration (ANAF).
The risk sub-criteria developed from the above four general criteria were approved by ANAF Order 2.017/2022.We will focus our attention, in the following, on the general criterion regarding the level of declaration and, more specifically, on the sub-criteria regarding the incoherence of the data in the tax returns compared to the data from other forms provided by law, submitted by the taxpayer, and, respectively, the inconsistency of the data from the tax returns and from other forms provided by law, submitted by the taxpayer, compared to data and information transmitted by third parties (specific sub-criteria provided for in that order).
What are the main inconsistencies and inconsistencies that are considered in the analysis of this fiscal risk sub-criteria?The tax legislation contains no specific provisions that clarify these aspects or expressly state what correlations must exist between the data declared during the various types of reports that taxpayers must consider.It is noted that, in the following, the two situations that were frequently identified by ANAF and which led to the start of fiscal controls are listed in order to clarify the factual situation, and those would be:
- Inconsistencies between the amounts included in the corporate tax returns and the amounts reported in the financial statements
- Discrepancies between the VAT return obligations of the taxpayer concerned and those related to its partners.
Other news from Romania
Romania Updates Pre-filled VAT Return Forms after VAT Rate Changes
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Romania’s tax authority (ANAF) is updating pre-filled VAT returns to reflect the new VAT rates introduced in August 2025, including the 21% standard rate and 11% reduced rate. From 2026, outdated rates will be removed from Form 300 and RO e-TVA, simplifying reporting and aligning returns with the current VAT framework. Romania’s tax authority (ANAF) is updating its pre-filled VAT return form... Read more
Romania Softens RO e-TVA Rules After Business Concerns
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Romania has limited the enforcement role of the RO e-TVA system through Emergency Ordinance No. 13/2026, removing the legal basis for automatic compliance notices and making the system informational only. While digital reporting obligations like SAF-T, e-Factura, and VAT returns remain unchanged, audits and penalties must now follow standard procedures rather than automated discrepancies. Romania... Read more
Romania: Exceptions to Cash Register Requirements in 2026
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
A fiscal cash register is required for sales to final consumers paid in cash or by card at the place of sale, while businesses receiving payments exclusively by bank transfer or selling only to companies may issue fiscal invoices instead. Under GEO 28/1999, numerous exemptions apply (e.g., transport, liberal professions, utilities collection, vending machines, and certain services), but when cash... Read more
Overview of Romania’s Tax Inspections (ANAF Inspections)
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Before a tax inspection begins, the tax authority must notify the taxpayer in writing at least 30 days in advance for large taxpayers and 15 days for others, and the inspection may only cover taxes and periods still within the statutory limitation period. During the inspection, taxpayers have extensive rights (including postponement, information, and professional assistance) and clear obligations... Read more
Romania: Individuals not Required to Use the RO e-Invoice system until June 1, 2026
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Romania has introduced a transition period until 1 June 2026 for individuals carrying out economic activities (identified by CNP, such as PFAs), during which use of the RO e-Invoice system is not yet mandatory. After this date, e-Invoicing will apply fully and will give the tax authority real-time, transaction-level visibility into individual economic activity, shifting compliance from delayed an... Read more
Romania e-Invoice Rules in 2026: Deadlines and Fines
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
From 1 January 2026, Romania requires all B2B, B2C, and B2G invoices to be transmitted through the RO e-Factura system, with B2B and B2C invoices due within 5 working days, and B2G invoices payable only if submitted via e-Invoice. Non-compliance triggers tiered fines by taxpayer size and, in B2B cases, a 15% penalty of the invoice value for issuers or recipients handling invoices outside the syst... Read more
Romania Postpones RO e-Factura Enforcement for Small Businesses
Romania
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Romania has postponed full enforcement of its RO e-Factura clearance system for small taxpayers (turnover below €500,000) until 1 July 2026, while the system itself remains mandatory and unchanged for B2B and B2C invoice reporting. This is a penalty deferral, not an exemption, and small businesses are still expected to test, adapt systems, and improve data quality now, as they will be subject to... Read more