The German government plans to strengthen enforcement of the receipt issuance obligation for retailers by amending § 379 of the Fiscal Code to classify failure to issue receipts as an administrative offense. This amendment will allow tax authorities to impose fines ranging from €5,000 to €25,000 to ensure compliance and enhance efforts to combat tax evasion. The move emphasizes using technical security devices (TSEs) in cash registers to secure accurate transaction records and deter non-compliance.
In Germany, there are harsher penalties for failing to issue receipts.
Public
Germany
Author: Stefan Ditrih
Category:
Fiscal subject related
Views:
811
Content accuracy validation date:
21.10.2024
Content accuracy validation time:
08:05h
The German government is preparing to strengthen enforcement of the receipt issuing obligation ("Belegausgabepflicht") for retailers, introduced in 2020 under § 146a of the German Fiscal Code (Abgabenordnung, AO). The requirement mandates that businesses issue receipts, whether electronically or on paper, for every transaction involving a cash register. This regulation aims to increase transparency and combat tax evasion by ensuring that all sales are properly recorded. However, in practice, compliance has been inconsistent due to the lack of effective sanctions for non-compliance.
To address this gap, a key change is being proposed to § 379 AO of the Fiscal Code, which covers administrative tax offenses. The amendment aims to introduce clearer penalties for businesses that fail to meet the receipt issuance obligation. Under the current framework, the ability to enforce sanctions for non-compliance has been limited, meaning many businesses have neglected the requirement without facing significant consequences.
The proposed expansion of § 379 AO would formally classify the failure to issue receipts as an administrative offense. This will empower tax authorities to levy fines against non-compliant businesses, significantly increasing the pressure on retailers to comply with the regulations. The receipt issuance requirement is a key part of Germany's efforts to secure tax revenue by ensuring accurate transaction records through the use of technical security devices (TSEs) integrated into cash register systems.
Under the revised § 379 AO, fines for administrative offenses, including the failure to issue receipts, are expected to range from €5,000 to €25.00*, depending on the severity of the violation. The introduction of these fines is designed to act as a deterrent, encouraging retailers to adopt compliant systems and processes. Repeat offenders may face higher penalties, and the risk of audits by tax authorities will likely increase as the government steps up its enforcement efforts.
Other news from Germany
Germany: Procedure in Case of POS or Cash Register Failure
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
In Germany, if a POS or cash register fails, businesses must follow strict procedures set out in §146 AO, §146a AO, the KassenSichV, and AEAO. The preferred solution is to switch to another TSE-compliant system, but if none is available, continuous handwritten records must be kept, and the outage fully documented with supporting evidence. Read more
Subscribe to get access to the latest news, documents, webinars and educations.
Already subscriber? Login
Germany Published New E-Invoicing Guideline Linking VAT Law to EU Standard
Public
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Germany has released a new e-invoicing guideline that maps the legal requirements of the VAT Act (UStG) to the EU standard EN 16931, ensuring structured compliance and interoperability. Developed by XStandards Einkauf, FeRD, and AWV, the guideline provides businesses and software providers with a practical tool to guarantee that e-invoices meet all mandatory VAT information requirements. A new gui... Read more
Germany: Deutsche Fiskal Released a New Update of the FCC
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
The latest update of the Fiskal Cloud Connector (FCC version 4.2.2) is now available for download. More information is given as follows. Read more
Subscribe to get access to the latest news, documents, webinars and educations.
Already subscriber? Login
Germany Amends the Application Decree to the Tax Code – AEAO
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
On September 1, 2025, Germany’s Federal Ministry of Finance issued a BMF letter amending the Application Decree to the Tax Code (AEAO), updating rules on bookkeeping, electronic recording systems with TSE, and document retention. The changes align references with the July 14, 2025 GoBD update, ensuring consistency with Germany’s new mandatory e-invoicing system. Read more
Subscribe to get access to the latest news, documents, webinars and educations.
Already subscriber? Login
Germany: Rounding Rules in Tax Invoices
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Germany follows strict VAT invoice rounding rules under the UStAE, requiring tax amounts to be shown to the cent and rounded down if the next digit is 4 or less, or up if it is 5 or more. While EN 16931 allows flexibility in rounding methods, Germany mandates this specific approach to ensure consistency in tax calculations. Read more
Subscribe to get access to the latest news, documents, webinars and educations.
Already subscriber? Login
Germany: Is a QR Code Enough Instead of a Paper Receipt?
Public
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Germany’s Higher Administrative Court of Lüneburg asked the ECJ to decide whether a QR code can replace a paper receipt from weighing scales, challenging the long-held view that only printed paper meets legal standards. The case could redefine receipt rules under EU law, focusing on whether digital formats still guarantee transparency, legibility, and customer protection. In August 2025, the Highe... Read more
Germany: Court Rejects Fast-Food VAT Allocation Method
Germany
Author: Ivana Picajkić
Germany’s Federal Fiscal Court ruled that fast-food chains cannot use the “food-and-paper” method to allocate VAT on discounted menus, as it can inflate the price of drinks beyond their standalone value. The court emphasized that while companies may choose their allocation method, it must reasonably reflect economic reality. Read more
Subscribe to get access to the latest news, documents, webinars and educations.
Already subscriber? Login