General information
Main Takeaways:
- Definitions vary: Some states exempt digital products as intangible, while others tax them similarly to tangible goods
- SST states use standardized terms (e.g., digital books, audio, audiovisual works), but still differ in their tax application
- Sourcing rules are tricky: Many states apply destination-based sourcing, though digital products can be accessed from multiple locations, and sellers may lack full buyer data
Taxable Digital Goods
Many states tax at least some digital products, including:
- Audio files (music, ringtones, podcasts)
- eBooks, magazines, newspapers
- Streaming services (TV, movies)
States like Texas, Washington, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Maryland tax most digital goods. Some, such as Connecticut, apply varying rates based on whether the buyer is a consumer or business.
The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (SSUTA) mandates consistent definitions, but member states can choose to tax or exempt digital products at their discretion.
States that Generally Exempt Digital Goods
States like California, Florida, Michigan, Virginia, and Illinois typically do not tax most downloaded or streamed digital content. However, exceptions often apply:
- Florida taxes streaming under its Communications Services Tax.
- Illinois applies the Chicago amusement tax to streaming.
Five states (Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon) have no general state sales tax at all.
Sourcing Challenges
Digital product sales are typically sourced to the user’s location or billing address. However, sellers may lack accurate location data, especially for streaming or downloadable goods accessed across devices or locations.
Compliance Tips
- Taxability often depends on the buyer's identity (B2B vs. B2C) or how the product is delivered (e.g., digitally vs. with physical media).
- Laws are evolving—states may update rules frequently, and definitions may not reflect modern technology.
- Automated tax software and consultation with tax professionals are recommended for managing multi-state compliance.
Bottom Line
There’s no federal digital tax in the U.S., and each state sets its own policies. Businesses must collect sales tax in states where they have nexus and should stay updated on rule changes to avoid non-compliance. While some states provide clear frameworks, others rely on outdated laws or issue case-by-case rulings, making digital tax compliance a moving target.
Other news from Other countries
South Africa: Real-Time E-Invoicing Framework Set for 2028 Rollout
Other countries
Author: Ljubica Blagojević
The South African Revenue Service (SARS) is advancing its VAT Modernization program, which aims to introduce structured e-invoicing and near real-time invoice data reporting to replace periodic VAT filings. The system will enable ERP-based invoice transmission and AI-driven cross-checks to improve compliance and reduce the estimated R800 billion tax gap. Development and consultations are planned f... Read more
Qatar's General Tax Authority (GTA) Warning on Fraud
Other countries
Author: Ema Stamenković
GTA warns taxpayers about fraudulent emails and texts impersonating them, urging verification through official channels and reporting scams. The GTA issued a press release warning taxpayers about fraudulent emails and text messages impersonating the Authority. These messages contain suspicious links claiming tax refunds or requesting personal information updates. The GTA confirmed these communica... Read more
UAE: Electronic Invoicing Version 1.0 Guide Published
Other countries
Author: Ema Stamenković
UAE Ministry of Finance published electronic invoicing guidelines for phased rollout starting July 2026. The UAE Electronic Invoicing Guidelines Version 1.0 have been published by the UAE Ministry of Finance. The document lays out the primary technological and regulatory framework to assist companies in getting ready for the nationwide rollout of electronic invoicing, which will begin in phases on... Read more
The UAE E-Invoicing Guidelines
Other countries
Author: Ema Stamenković
The UAE e-invoicing model involves a decentralized, Peppol-based framework for in-scope transactions, including B2B, B2G, G2B, and G2G, while excluding B2C. Suppliers must appoint one ASP for e-invoices, maintaining compliance responsibility. Onboarding involves understanding requirements, selecting an ASP, and testing exchanges. Six invoice categories exist, with specified regulations for special... Read more
South Africa’s VAT Modernization: The Roadmap to Mandatory E-Invoicing
Other countries
Author: Ljubica Blagojević
South Africa’s VAT Modernisation program plans a phased move to mandatory e-invoicing and near real-time VAT reporting, supported by SARS strategy documents and reinforced through 2026 stakeholder consultations. While not yet mandated, SARS is preparing structured invoice data reporting to strengthen compliance, reduce fraud, and enable automated monitoring. The model will require businesses to tr... Read more
UAE E-Invoicing Compliance: Complete 2026 Guide
Other countries
Author: Ema Stamenković
The UAE is implementing mandatory e-invoicing by 2026-2027, following Ministerial Decisions No. 244 and No. 243 of 2025. Companies must be ready to receive electronic invoices, designate Accredited Service Providers (ASP), and use the PINT-AE format via the Peppol network, governed by a decentralized model. With a rollout scheduled for 2026 and 2027, the UAE is headed toward mandatory e-invoicing... Read more
New VAT Deemed Supplier Rules for Electronic Marketplaces in Saudi Arabia from Jan 2026
Other countries
Author: Ema Stamenković
The guidance outlines when VAT responsibility shifts to electronic marketplaces, impacting reporting and operations. Deemed supplier status applies to non-resident electronic services and resident non-registered suppliers. Obligations include VAT invoicing and returns. Key exceptions exist, but operational involvement influences VAT responsibilities, especially for food delivery and accommodation... Read more